RSS Feed

Archive: August, 2006

Unable to unplug, tech addicts may sue, researcher says

Could gadgets like BlackBerries and cell phones ring up lawsuits?
Wojtek Dabrowski

August 25, 2006 (Reuters) — Keeping employees on electronic leashes such as laptops, BlackBerries and other devices that allow them to be constantly connected to the office could soon lead to lawsuits by those who grow addicted to the technology, a U.S. academic warns.

In a follow-up to an earlier paper on employees’ tech addictions, Gayle Porter, associate professor of management at the Rutgers University School of Business in Camden, N.J., has written a paper that states that workers whose personal lives suffer as a result of tech addictions could turn their sights on their employers.

While I can certainly relate, I think the point that the article makes about people not being able to draw the line between work & home is very important. The author states that people’s lives turn to crap, and they look for someone to blame (typical).

One thing that serving in the military taught me is how to keep things in perspective. The first year I was married, I spent 54 days at home. That sucked ass. I knew then that I was in the wrong job, and that I was going to have to do something about it. There were plenty of officers that’d come before me, and there were certainly going to be tons of them proceeding; keeping that in mind let me realize that the military would survive just fine w/o me.

I’ve carried that same mentality with me into Corporate America, too. When it’s time to be home, people have learned that I’m pretty much not to be bothered. My time is my time. There are occasional exceptions, and I have no problem w/ that, but I’ve seen far too many co-workers spend all of their free time on the job.

Federal judge orders halt to NSA spy program | CNET News.com

Federal judge orders halt to NSA spy program | CNET News.com
Warrantless surveillance authorized by Bush administration is ruled unconstitutional, must cease immediately.
By Anne Broache
Staff Writer, CNET News.com
Published: August 17, 2006, 9:44 AM PDT

The warrantless Internet and telephone surveillance program authorized by the Bush administration violates the U.S. Constitution and must cease immediately, a federal judge ruled Thursday.

The landmark decision makes U.S. District Judge Anna Diggs Taylor in Detroit the first judge to strike down the National Security Agency’s once-secret program. The American Civil Liberties Union had filed suit against the government, claiming the program “ran roughshod” over the constitutional rights of millions of Americans and ran afoul of federal wiretapping law.

In a sweeping victory for the ACLU and its clients, which included organizations representing criminal defense lawyers, journalists, Islamic-Americans, and academics, Taylor appears to knock down every major legal argument that the Bush administration has used to defend the program since it was revealed by The New York Times last December.

The terrorist surveillance program, she ruled, violates the First Amendment’s right to freedom of expression and the Fourth Amendment right to privacy–that is, freedom from unreasonable searches. It also ignores requirements of a 1978 electronic wiretapping law known as the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) and represents an overstepping of presidential powers, Taylor wrote.

The judge also dismissed the government’s request that the suit be thrown out because of the “state secrets privilege,” which permits the government to suppress a lawsuit that might lead to the disclosure of military secrets.

I know this is supposed to be good news, but let’s back up a second.

Read carefully and you’ll see that even after our government was internationally exposed to be the hypocritcal mess it is, they STILL HAD TO FUCKING BE TOLD TO STOP BY A JUDGE.

What happened to doing the right thing, and being honorable?

Comments Off

More Linux Testing

Well, I’ve finally settled in w/ Ubuntu on a laptop and stopped feeling like there were a lot of things left to get set up.

With the installation of Blog Entry Poster, I’ve now got almost every app/utility covered that I had in OS X. Some of the apps are better(ish), but most are lacking in some way or another. The app I miss the absolute MOST is LaunchBar.

Comments Off

Dork Tries Linux

J00BuntuRight, so at work I’m going to be trying out virtual workstations as a way of making better use of the hardware we already have.  I’ll go into more detail on that as the project progresses, but for now, I wanna talk about some of my experiences w/ Linux.

For starters, the reason I’m trying Linux is to serve as the thin workstation that my users will use to start either a VNC session or a VMWare Console session w/ their virtual XP host that’s running on a VMWare server.  One of the goals of this prototype is to determine if it’s feasible to push the cost of computing and hard disk requirements into the NOC where I can get higher utilization percentages out of my hardware while running very cheap, underwhelming workstations.

Three distros of Linux came to mind:  Fedora Core, Ubuntu and Suse.  As a long time Mac and Windows user, I figured this would be a great learning exercise for me to get to know Linux and to secretly determine if there was a chance I might use it as my daily OS, or even (GASP!) try introducing some users to it.

Having not tried Linux for years now, I was expecting pretty much the same experience:  very solid, very configurable, rough around the edges.  I’ve played w/ some open source programs that people’ve ported to the Mac, and I knew that there was a high level of sophistication in store for me, but I was honestly taken by surprise by just how close these OS’s are to being ready for plain users.

The main point that I want to make is that they aren’t quite there yet, and I’ll give this one example.  In Ubuntu today, I wanted to adjust the resolution to the laptop’s native display resolution.  Given just the three choices of 640×480, 800×600 and 1024×768, I was somewhat irritated.  After asking Ted how to fix it, he recommended googling, and what I fixed it based on the discussion thread I found here

What pissed me off is that after going through the text-based config program, I happened to have chosen a bad option, so the UI wouldn’t start anymore.  Rebooting left me in the shell.  That sucks.  There has to be a better way.

Last thing I want is my users goofin around in the shell.

ABC News: Sen. Clinton Says Rumsfeld Should Resign

ABC News: Sen. Clinton Says Rumsfeld Should Resign
Sen. Clinton Says Rumsfeld Should Resign
AP Interview: Sen. Clinton Rips Rumsfeld; Calls for His Resignation
By DEVLIN BARRETT
The Associated Press

WASHINGTON – Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton called Thursday for the resignation of Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld, hours after excoriating him at a public hearing over what she said was a “failed policy” in Iraq.

“I just don’t understand why we can’t get new leadership that would give us a fighting chance to turn the situation around before it’s too late,” the New York Democrat told the Associated Press. “I think the president should choose to accept Secretary Rumsfeld’s resignation.”

I think she’d actually have a shot if she ran for president in ’08.

She’s been through the typical bashing expected by a woman, weathered the most public marital scandal ever and still managed to come out as her own person, strong and vocal. I only hope the rest of the country’s ready to embrace her (figuratively, of course :p) the same way I have.

LiveScience.com – Men Act Like Dogs to Determine Dominance

LiveScience.com – Men Act Like Dogs to Determine Dominance
Men Act Like Dogs to Determine Dominance
By Ker Than
LiveScience Staff Writer
posted: 31 July 2006
09:11 am ET

A male dog will whine and beg in deference to a stronger dog, but will lower its voice into a guttural growl if it thinks it has a fighting chance.

Men unconsciously do a similar thing, scientists say.

A new study finds that the lower the pitch of a man’s voice, the more physically dominant other men think he is. And men lower their voice pitch when addressing a man they believe to be less dominant than themselves, but raise it when speaking to someone they think is more dominant.

Huh.. makes sense. I have a pretty deep voice, which might explain a lot :D

Follow the link for a repost of the full text.

Read more »