Apple's
iSync
This has been, by far, the slickest software I've
come to love and enjoy in a good while.
What? I know other companies
have managed to sync their data before (most notably Palm's now
defunct MyPalm.com), but this is the first one that works on all
of the data I use on several machines and devices, and does it
as smoothly as can be expected.
Why? I think what I love
most about iSync is that it takes my Calendar/To Dos/Addresses
and browser bookmarks and keeps them all up-to-date across the
three Macs I use, my Bluetooth-enabled phone, my iPod and my Palm.
I can have all of my data at my fingertips whenever I need/want
it.
|
|
What? More than a To Do List manager, Life
Balance is more about managing your life.
Why? I like the approach that the guys at
Llamagraphics take to arranging your tasks -- it's not a simple
priority-based system, it's a holistic approach to ensuring you
pay attention to what's most important to you *at the very moment*
you're looking at your task list.
How, you ask? It's a simple idea, taken to it's most logical
extreme: show you only that tasks that can be completed *where*
you are, at that VERY moment, sorting that list by comparing the
relative importance of them to your life's goals. If you've
been ignoring one part of your life, that area's tasks will bubble
up higher in your task list. Entering tasks in their outline
entry format actually helps *define* what tasks
need to be accomplished to get the goals done.... it doesn't just
leave you to entering to-do's into a flat listing, arranged only
by priority.
If you're at the post office, but it's after closing time, you
won't be reminded to mail out that important package, because it
knows you can't possibly accomplish that task.
There's really so much to this app that it's hard to give it proper
coverage in the short amount of space I intended for this page.
Read the Advice
Book for specifics.
|
|
What? Volumes have been writtine about Macromedia's
excellent web development app. I'm not sure what else I can
say about it -- it's the tool of choice for so many people for a
reason. With Dreamweaver MX, you get a WYSIWYG HTML editor,
a web-based script IDE, and an HTML site management package... all
in the same box.
Why? I like that it both generates some
code for me, and that it respects my changes to it's generally sound
code. I like being able to press a single keystroke to have
all of my changes saved, and then uploaded to my web server, taking
all of the dependant images, style sheets and rich web content with
it. I like that when I drag & drop an image from one directory
to another, Dreamweaver will go through every file that references
that image, and modify the HTML that loads it, reflecting the new
location of the file. I like that when I sit down at one of
my other machines, I can tell it to synchronize my files so that
I get the latest ones onto my HD to work with.... and when I'm done,
I just synch my workstation back to the server, and I don't have
to worry whether or not the latest images/files/code are on the
server.
Sure.... these things can be done manually, but why would I want
to where there's a tool that does all of this, and does it WELL?
Macromedia recently updated the MX line to MX 2004, and they were
HORRIBLE until the 7.01 update. I'm using 7.01 now, so if you've
been using 7.0, update to 7.01, which came out in March 2004. The
difference is night & day.
|
|
What? Macromedia's image-manipulation software.....
you can modify pixels, apply filters, convert between formats and,
most importantly, add web interactivity to your images.
Why? Wait? Didn't you just descripe
Adobe Photoshop/Imageready? Yep.... I sure did. Why
would I be talking about Fireworks, then? I prefer Fireworks
to do my final web preps because it's MUCH better at creating clean
HTML, and the way it handles interactive images/mouseovers/image
swapping is MUCH cleaner than ImageReady. The code that comes
out of ImageReady is, IMHO, sloppy. Toss in Dreamweaver integration,
and I think you'll understand why I love Fireworks so much.
|